STLtoday.com | Posted: Thursday, September 8, 2011 3:00 am | (12) Comments
Opponents of the law that took effect last August contend the measure violates free expression rights. They also say lawmakers did not follow proper procedures when approving the legislation because a hearing was never held about its estimated cost despite such a request from a lawmaker.
The Missouri law requires sexually oriented businesses to close by midnight and bans full nudity, alcohol, minors and touching between seminude employees and customers. To ensure a hands-off policy, it mandates that seminude employees remain on a stage at least six feet from patrons.
Previously, a trial court in the Capitol’s home of Cole County denied a request for a temporary restraining order against the law and later upheld the law’s restrictions.
The legislation was defended Wednesday before the state high court by Ronald Holliger, the general counsel for the Missouri attorney general’s office and by Chattanooga, Tenn.-based attorney Scott Bergthold, who argued that the law’s restrictions do not violate freedom of expression rights.
Supporters of the law contend its regulations are aimed at combating negative side effects from sexually oriented businesses, including prostitution, drug use and public indecency. They said the Legislature relied upon previous court rulings, land use studies, crime and health impact reports, anecdotal evidence and expert witness testimony in approving the legislation and that the restrictions are not based on content.
Holliger argued that the state constitution does not require a hearing about the cost estimate of legislation.
The legal challenge to the restrictions on sexual businesses was filed by a group that includes several people and businesses involved in the adult entertainment industry. Attorney J. Michael Murray said during arguments before the high court that the law imposes “rigorous restrictions” on constitutionally protected expression.
“It has already proven devastating to the adult entertainment industry in Missouri, resulting in large-scale job losses, enormous loss of revenues, taxes, indeed the outright closure of several outlets for this expression that were previously thriving businesses and the threat that others will soon close, resulting in a massive reduction in the quantity and availability of constitutionally protected expression,” Murray said.
Copyright 2011 STLtoday.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/state-and-regional/missouri/article_80894883-f99a-51b3-8a61-4572a5ad22d2.html#ixzz1XPyR5wDJ