Maria Ruskiewicz told The Associated Press she met Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz in 2008 about a previous drug case. Ruskiewicz said after she left the meeting, she received several texts from Kratz that escalated into sexual harassment.
“The reason why I’m coming forward is he abuses his power, not only with women, but with women in certain situations who are extremely vulnerable to his authority,” Ruskiewicz, 31, an Appleton, Wis., native, told The Associated Press.
The first accusation against Kratz came to light last week when the AP published several text messages from Kratz to Stephanie Van Groll, the victim of a domestic violence case Kratz was trying in the fall of 2009. Van Groll, 26, went to police after she received the texts from Kratz, messages in which he called her a “tall, young, hot nymph” and asked whether she is “the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA.”
Kratz admitted to texting Van Groll and offered his “sincere and heartfelt apology” at a news conference Friday. He also said he had already begun psychotherapy to address the “selfishness” and “arrogance” that led to him contact Van Groll.
“My behavior was inappropriate,” Kratz said. “I’m embarrassed and ashamed for the choices that I made, and the fault was mine alone.”
Kratz’s office announced Monday he’d gone on leave.
Adding to Kratz’s woes, a second woman came forward Monday to claim similar harassment, saying Kratz had offered to let her attend an autopsy. In an e-mail written to Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle last week, the woman claimed to have met Kratz online in December 2009. On a dinner date, the woman said Kratz divulged to her the details of an ongoing murder investigation in which a woman was believed to have been killed by her boyfriend.
Kratz’s recently hired attorney, Robert J. Craanen, did not return calls for comment on the most recent accusation, but Craanen did deny to the AP the second woman’s claim about the autopsy date.
Doyle, the governor, a former district attorney and state attorney general, said Monday he would start proceedings to remove Kratz from office as soon as a “verified complaint” is filed by a county taxpayer, as required by law.
In an appearance on “Good Morning America,” Doyle said he would “commence the removal process” but did not say what the outcome would be.
“My reaction was the same as everyone who has worked on these issues over the years that this is just a terrible violation of trust,” he said on “GMA.”